Michelin’s LTX A/T 2 was released in 2007 and it is still being sold in the market! While Yokohama’s Geolandar A/T G015 was launched in 2015 which makes it look relatively new. Geolandar A/T G015 scored a higher “would you recommend” points at 8.1/10 compared to LTX A/T 2 ‘s 7.5/10.
For the subjective wet handling rating, Cross Climate 2 was rated better with a 7.5/10 rating compared to the 7.25/10 rating of Alenza AS Ultra. Overall, Cross Climate is a much better wet braking tire while the Alenza AS Ultra was just slightly faster around the wet tracks. Alenza AS Ultra: -4.4% in wet braking.
Michelin CrossClimate 2: 5.5 s Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO: 9.5 s: Snow Handling Michelin CrossClimate 2: 110 s Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO: 125.4 s: Noise Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210: 69.1 dB Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO: 69.8 dB: Price Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210: 71.89 Michelin CrossClimate 2: 104.99
Being able to match the handling and braking capability of a traditional all-season tire has these Vredestein all-weather designs scoring a collective rating of 4.5 stars out of 5 from Tire Rack
This was proven to be true as Michelin’s Cross Climate 2 proved to be slightly more expensive compared to Continental’s AllSeasonContact. Tire size: 205/55 R16. Cross Climate 2: €91.6. AllSeasonContact: €86.6. Difference: -6% more cheaper for AllSeasonContact.
I’d expect the CC2 to have better snow/wet traction than any “sport” all season. The AS4 has grip and handling characteristics closer to a summer performance tire. It’s got “OK” snow traction, good wet traction, and much better dry traction and handling than an all season tire typically has.

You can also consider the Nokian WR G4, which has slightly less dry and wet grip than the CrossClimate 2 but more snow and ice grip. Alternatively, you can consider a performance winter tire. A performance winter tire tends to have better snow and ice grip than an all-season tire, but not as good as a severe winter tire, and a performance

Well the Michelin’s CrossClimate 2 SUV is overall a pretty decent pick. In dry conditions, it offers superior linear grip and responsive steering, thanks to its streamlined tread design and lighter weight. And in wet, you get great overall traction, though it’s steering response needs slight improvements here still.

The new CrossClimate 2 tire has a different compound in the tread the provides improved wet and dry braking, including snow performance over the old Michelin CrossClimate SUV tires. The actual compound in the tread is where you get the better performance in wet and dry. The new CC2 has a different compound than CC+, I would not use CC+'s review
zGNoHI.
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/36
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/186
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/870
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/8
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/351
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/581
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/639
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/758
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/735
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/660
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/948
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/420
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/738
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/863
  • 9erkt2r2tq.pages.dev/751

    • michelin crossclimate 2 tires review